A case from Budva: what does the Ministry’s letter of 11 March 2026 actually mean?
A client approached us after reading the Ministry’s letter dated 11 March 2026, addressed to Opština Budva.
After reading it, he reached a worrying conclusion:
if the building has problematic areas and other residents are not filing anything, then his own legalization case cannot move forward properly until everyone else starts resolving their issues as well.
We reviewed the case carefully and explained the key point:
in his specific situation, he does need to go through legalization.
But that does not mean his case automatically depends on whether the other owners have filed documents for their own problematic areas.
Why did this concern arise in the first place?
Because the Ministry’s letter of 11 March 2026 does indeed address an important issue:
if a building contains unlawfully extended, added, or enlarged PDs, those parts must be dealt with.
But in practice, such letters should not be read too broadly.
The mere fact that there are other problematic areas in the building does not automatically mean that every owner becomes “held hostage” by everyone else.
In situations like this, it is always necessary to analyze separately:
— the building itself;
— the owner’s specific PD;
— that owner’s documents;
— the relationship between that PD and the permit history of the building;
— and the legal basis on which that specific case is being processed.
That is exactly what we did in this case.
The main takeaway is this:
the Ministry’s letter must be read precisely.
It does not mean that every case in the same building is frozen until all neighbors resolve their issues. But it also does not remove the need to examine each PD and its legal status separately.
If your building also has a general encumbrance, a disputed status, or a history of unauthorized extensions, these situations should not be assessed based on a general impression from one document. What is needed is a proper review of your specific property.
Telegram: @Legalafy
Channel: @kf_legalafy_guide
Website: kf-legalafy.me
#budva #montenegro #legalization #realestate #montenegroproperty #kflegalafy
A client approached us after reading the Ministry’s letter dated 11 March 2026, addressed to Opština Budva.
After reading it, he reached a worrying conclusion:
if the building has problematic areas and other residents are not filing anything, then his own legalization case cannot move forward properly until everyone else starts resolving their issues as well.
We reviewed the case carefully and explained the key point:
in his specific situation, he does need to go through legalization.
But that does not mean his case automatically depends on whether the other owners have filed documents for their own problematic areas.
Why did this concern arise in the first place?
Because the Ministry’s letter of 11 March 2026 does indeed address an important issue:
if a building contains unlawfully extended, added, or enlarged PDs, those parts must be dealt with.
But in practice, such letters should not be read too broadly.
The mere fact that there are other problematic areas in the building does not automatically mean that every owner becomes “held hostage” by everyone else.
In situations like this, it is always necessary to analyze separately:
— the building itself;
— the owner’s specific PD;
— that owner’s documents;
— the relationship between that PD and the permit history of the building;
— and the legal basis on which that specific case is being processed.
That is exactly what we did in this case.
The main takeaway is this:
the Ministry’s letter must be read precisely.
It does not mean that every case in the same building is frozen until all neighbors resolve their issues. But it also does not remove the need to examine each PD and its legal status separately.
If your building also has a general encumbrance, a disputed status, or a history of unauthorized extensions, these situations should not be assessed based on a general impression from one document. What is needed is a proper review of your specific property.
Telegram: @Legalafy
Channel: @kf_legalafy_guide
Website: kf-legalafy.me
#budva #montenegro #legalization #realestate #montenegroproperty #kflegalafy